At the beginning of the year we all got nice shiney new Macs, complete with spanking new copies of Adobe Creative Suite. You see, we've decided, in the interests of intra-studio harmony, to ditch Freehand (hooray!) and Quark (sniff, sob!) and embrace Illustrator (yeeha!) and InDesign (!**?!!); and for the first time in countless years have signed up for some formal training.
As it happened, it turned out to be about the best bit of formal Mac-related training I've had and while the trainer was a patronising smart-arse he displayed extensive and useful knowledge, so by the end of the day I had warmed to him.
But there was a moment at the end of the morning session when I suddenly felt a welcome moment of superiority, when he displayed a gaping hole in his apparent knowledge. He was explaining the Slug feature in InDesign and for some reason felt the need to explain where the term came from. He explained how it was a throw-back to the days of "Letraset" and then patronised us a little when we looked baffled at the reference (he actually meant letterpress). He then held up a small collection of brass letterpress matrices and, calling them "slugs", tried to explain how they were used to print from (he meant be used to press ink onto paper, not be used to cast lead type). Too busy scratching my head to challenge him, I started to think about Cal Swann's book.
This was the first bit I wanted to check:
But flicking through the book, I remembered what a classic it is and that's the real purpose of this post.
Written with great economy, it's full of wisdom as important today as it was when it was published in 1969.
Tucked inside my copy is a promotional flyer/order form for the book.
...
Incidentally, and back to the training, amongst the stuff we learned was how to alter the justification method. This is what our trainer suggested was the prefered setting:
Now I must admit that the letterspacing and glyph scaling bits troubled me but I have to admit that, a) it wasn't a million miles off the setting I would use in Quark, and b) in the before and after example he gave us the after did look much better with these settings applied. Has anyone got anything to say about this? Stephen?